BPA trading room Q&A: September 4, 2015
I trade breakout pullbacks. I always need three or four-point stops to make one to two points. Is that acceptable?
Video duration: 5min 13sec
Video transcript
Scalping breakout pullbacks with wide stops
I do that all the time. So can you use a four-point stop to make a one-point scalp? On most days, if the days’ range is 40 points, you’re not going to do it. But if the range is 10 points, sometimes 20 points, and we’re in a fairly quiet trading range part of a 20-point day, sometimes I will risk four points to make one point but only if I’m willing to scale in. So for example, let’s say I placed a limit order to buy the 6 low, I’m probably not going to get my one-point profit right away; I’m probably going to buy more one point lower and probably going to use a five or six-point stop.
What do you know about probability? When you ask that question, you know something. You’re saying, “Can I make a one-point scalp using a four-point stop?” Immediately, what are you saying? There are always three variables and you just gave two of them. You said big risk, small reward. So you automatically know probability. Anytime you have small reward, big risk, you have a bad risk reward ratio where your risk is much bigger than your reward. That’s a terrible risk/reward ratio. If you have a terrible risk/reward ratio, you know that the probability has to be high, right, because the guy on the other side cannot have everything going his way. So anytime you’re using a wide stop, your probability’s going to be high, but your wide stop means that you’re risking a lot so if you use a wide enough stop, you can pretty much buy any day and make money, and you can pretty much sell any day and make money. If you use a 100-point stop, and you buy at any point and then scale in 20, 30, or 40 points lower, you’re almost certainly going to make money. You’re going to make money probably 80 percent of the time, but occasionally — maybe 10 or 20 percent of the time — you’re going to lose 100 points, but the math is okay.
Experience and comfort needed for scaling in
But back to your question, “Is it okay to risk four points to make one point?” Only if you’re not going to scale in, if you have to be right 90 percent of the time or else it’s a losing strategy, and really good traders I know — I’ve traded with a bunch of traders who win 90 percent of the time, scalpers who win 90 percent of the time so it can be done. But if you’re starting out, that is not what you should be doing because you are not going to be winning 90 percent of the time. And also, you should not be scaling in. However, if you start getting some experience and some comfort and you can trade small enough so that you’re perfectly comfortable scaling in, then you can do that. But you got to make sure that you’re reading the market cycle correctly. You don’t want to be buying in a really tight channel bear trend because if you look at the 15-minute chart and you say, “Wait a minute, on the five-minute chart it’s a bear channel, but on the 15-minute chart it’s a bear breakout. Every bar is closing on its low.” So you have to make sure that you’re assessing the market correctly — which is easier, in hindsight, but that’s really key if you’re going to be taking a small profit/big risk trades, and especially if you’re scaling in. You have to really know what you’re doing and you have to be really comfortable with what you’re doing.
A lot of times, maybe I can find you an example of something here. I’m looking for one specific thing that happens fairly often, and because I’m saying it happens fairly often it’s going to be hard to find. What I’m looking for is a reasonable buy. This is really — this is kind of an example of it, but it’s not a very good example of it. But let’s say 36 is a great-looking buy; bulls will buy the high, they’ll use a very wide stop, and they’re willing to scale in. They don’t make a profit and immediately break strongly to the downside. They’ll buy more on the reversal up. And if this is a reasonable buy and the context is good and the signal bar is decent, buying that reversal up and getting out breakeven is a logical strategy. Even if you have a breakout like this — a five bar bear breakout. So to me, if I’m trading a fund and 36 looked like a pretty good buy, I would either buy 36 and then buy the reversal up above 44 or 45, or not buy 36 and then when I get down here I’m thinking the scale-in bulls will buy and we’ll get back to that high so I’ll buy the reversal up. So that’s the kind of thing that I’m talking about.
Good read on market cycle also needed
If you have enough experience and you’re pretty confident, and you read of what the market cycle is doing, what the price action is doing, then you can do that, but if you get very stressed out and very upset, and very worried as you get four of five bar breakout against you, obviously you should not be doing that; not only because you’ll mess up and not make money, more importantly, you got to like your job, right, and if you’re stressing out and feeling really miserable, and unhappy, and tense, that’s not fun. You don’t want to do that.
Al Brooks
Information on Al’s Online day trading room
Hi Al,
Apologies for the off-topic question but seeing as you are discussing %s here it seemed like a reasonable place to ask it;
If 80% of reversal attempts fail, how can a trade never be more than 60% certain? Say I go short in a bear at 50% pullback, stop at the last lower high, target at the low. If the reversal attempt has an 80% chance of failing and becoming a bear flag, surely the probability of my trade is more than 60%?
Thanks
In a TR, 80% of breakouts fail. In a trend, 80% of reversals fail. These are my guides, but applying them is subjective, and you are right that probability, risk, and reward all are involved when structuring a trade.
When a trader sells a 50% PB in a bear trend, he has a 60% chance of a new low before his stop is hit. The reward equals the risk, but the probability favors tht bears. This is a good trade for the bears.
There is an 80% chance that the bear reversal will fail. That means there is an 80% chance that the reversal will not lead to a bull trend. It can fail and become a bull trend. It can fail and become a trading range.
Hi Al,
You mention scaling in once the market turns up and offers another buy signal. However, I remember hearing you speak on many occasions about traders scaling after 1 pt or 2 pts. Is the preferred method, of scaling in, to place a limit order 1 pt away from the entry price or to wait for the market to give a proper signal?
Thank you
There are many factors involved. In a quiet TR where the risk of a big BO against me is small, I like to scale in at 1 – 2 pts, depending on the size of the moves.
Hi Al,
I was watching the course video 25 Support, Resistance and Measured Moves. You explain there that the computers control the markets (23:16min of the video) and the example is 5 min chart. My question is , would the HFT machines affect those charts when they probably trade based on tic charts.
Thanks
Dobromir
I could write a lot about this. All markets are fractal, which means the same processes are taking place on all time frames. Mkts are controlled by logic because illogical participants would lose and stop trading. There are never enough losers to influence the charts.
HFT firms cannot make money by being anything other than logical. This means that they are trading exactly as a really good trader would trade if he could trade in that time frame. Every chart is just a representation of mkt logic playing out. It does not matter if it is a tick chart or a monthly chart. There are enough players operating on all time frames to make all of them close to perfect expressions of logical behavior. This means that all charts look the same if you remove the time and price axes. This also means that HFT machines have no affect on the charts. If a trader is looking at a 5 min chart, it would look the same whether or not there were HFT firms trading tick charts. The smallest building block might then be a 1 min or a 1000 contract chart, and a number of these blocks would create the 5 min chart. It does not matter how small the blocks are. The 5 min chart would look the same. How do I know? I have been watching the 5 min chart for every tick for almost 30 years, and I have studied charts that go back for 100 years. Also, I have thought a lot about this. All the evidence that I see on the charts and common sense makes me strongly believe that I am right… but I might be wrong! If I see convincing evidence to the contrary, I will change my mind. I have been looking very hard for this evidence and have never found any.
Thanks Al,
I was convinced that you know a lot about the markets the minute I finished the videos from the course. I know that because I would spend enough time watching and studding over the weekend and Mondays are usually good days for me. The books and the videos act like System reset for a new trader. But anyway my other question is, if I was to order the new edition of the Trading course would I have to pay the full price or just a fee for the update.
Thanks,
Dobromir
Hi Dobromir,
Allow me to answer for our very busy Al. All purchasers of current course will get full access to new course when it is ready. Hopefully Q1 2016. Nothing more to pay.
Thank you for the answer .
Regards,
Dobromir